Graphics hardware requirements and recommendations


General recommendations:


The summary here is just for your reference, so you can get a feeling on what to expect with specific hardware. If you buy new systems, go for the latest generation hardware of NVidia or ATI. Currently, stuff that claims to support Direct3D-10, OpenGL-3 or ShaderModel 4, does support all functionality of Psychtoolbox in the most optimal way. All cards of the NVidia GeForce 8 series and later (e.g., 8600, 8800, 9600, 9800, GTX 280 etc.), as well as all cards of the ATI Radeon HD series and later (HD 2400, 2600, 3000 series, 4000 series etc.) and their corresponding counterparts from the NVidia Quadro series and ATI FireGL / FirePro line of cards are technically state of the art and Psychtoolbox can take full advantage of their useful new features. Expensive high-end models differ from cheap low-end models almost only in raw performace, ie., drawing speed, not in functionality, unless stated otherwise below.

Mobile graphics chips (in Laptops) are almost always slower than discrete graphics cards in desktop computers. This is a design tradeoff to accomodate the stricter requirements for cooling, space and power consumption in portable computers.

So called "integrated graphics chips" (aka "onboard graphics chips" or "chipset graphics" or IGPs) are usually cheaper and consume less power and space in a computer, which is why they are often found in Laptop computers and cheap desktops. Their disadvantage is usually much lower performance. The latest onboard parts from NVidia and ATI provide the same or almost the same features as dedicated graphics cards, so there isn't a limitation in functionality per se. The raw processing power is lower though, because these chips often don't have dedicated fast VRAM memory, but share slow RAM system memory with all other parts of your computer. They usually also have less processing units (so called shader processors or stream processors). All in all they may be sufficient for many not too demanding tasks. Very compute intense, image processing intense or memory intense tasks may not be feasible in practice because although they are doable in principle with the given feature set, the raw performance is just pathetically insufficient for research grade realtime behaviour. They are usually perfectly sufficient for designing and debugging your experiment scripts, where absolute realtime performance doesn't matter.

Tested graphics hardware + operating system configurations:


The following combinations of graphics hardware and operating systems are used by the developers for development of PTB-3's Screen function and therefore tested and known to work well within their respective feature set. This doesn't exclude other similar or more advanced system configurations which likely will work equally well or maybe even better. It just happens to be the equipment that is accessible to us for development and testing. As a rule of thumb, a specific feature of a specific piece of graphics hardware that works well on MS-Windows will likely work equally well on GNU/Linux and vice versa due to the unified drivers used for these operating systems (drivers for Windows and Linux by ATI and NVidia are derived from the same code base). This is not necessarily true for Win/Linux vs. Mac OS-X, because the OpenGL drivers for OS-X are developed by different development teams from a different code base - Apple imposes a much stricter control over their implementation of OpenGL, with different priorities wrt. feature set. This means that the same gfx hardware may expose different functionality, performance, limitations and bugs on OS-X vs. Win/Linux due to fundamental driver differences.

The following setups are used for development and testing of PTB, so they get tested for compatibility at least once for each beta release:

These cards get tested infrequently, i.e., if significant changes inside Screen() indicate need for testing and if the systems are available for testing:

Rough lineup of different generations of graphics hardware with their respective features:


Basic OpenGL 1.2 compliant hardware:

These provide the minimum amount of functionality for use with Psychtoolbox:

The limitations are due to lack of programmable shader support, lack of support for framebuffer objects and lack of support for rectangle textures. Typical examples of such hardware are: All ATI Rage 128 (Pro) and older, all Intel chips older than the GMA-950, all NVidia chips before GeForce-2.

Hardware with additional support for rectangle textures:

Typical examples are all NVidia GeForce hardware from GeForce-2 series upto GeForce-4 series, all ATI Radeon hardware upto Radeon 9200.

Hardware with support for framebuffer objects and programmable shaders (Shader model 2.0):

Improvements:

Typical examples are all NVidia GeForceFX cards (5200, 5800 etc.) and all Radeon 9600, 9700, 9800, X400, X600, X800 cards. Intel GMA 950 and X3000 series.

Hardware with support for Shader model 3.0 shaders and limited support for floating point textures and framebuffer objects:

Typical examples are all Radeon X1000 series GPUs (e.g., X1400, X1600, X1950) and all NVidia GeForce 6 and 7 series GPUs (e.g., GeForce 6800, GeForce 7800 etc.).

The Intel X3100 series chips and later (e.g., some Apple MacBooks) and its siblings are special in the sense that feature-wise they are Direct3D 10 cards with support for Shader model version 4 - they can do most of what the most recent state of the art cards of NVidia and ATI can do. However, they lack any support for frame-sequential stereo, anti-aliasing and high precision HDR framebuffers and due to lack of dedicated fast VRAM memory, they only have a low computational performance. So although theoretically "state of the art" cards, they are too restricted and weak for the typical applications of such state of the art cards.

State of the art hardware with support for Direct3D 10, ShaderModel 4.0 and fast full precision floating point textures and framebuffers:

These cards remove the remaining limitations of the previous generation hardware mentioned above. They can store and handle stimuli (and any kind of drawing or image processing operations on that stimuli) at full speed without any restrictions at full 32 bit floating point precision, that is with at least 23 bits of effective linear precision. Shading operations, e.g., for post processing, or procedural drawing of complex stimuli can be even more complex.

This is the hardware you want for simple, efficient and fast generation of high precision contrast or color stimuli, complex compositing and post-processing of stimuli and for display on high precision devices like 10 bit framebuffers, 12/13 bit video attenuators or 14-16 bit devices like Bits++, or high dynamic range displays.

These graphics cards are also fully equipped for future GPU stream computing applications - They are capable of supporting some planned exciting future PTB features which wouldn't be possible with previous generation GPUs.

Typical examples are all NVidia GPUs of type GeForce 8000 and later (e.g., 8200, 8400, 8600, 8800, 9200, 9600, 9800, GTX-2xx series and later) and all Radeon HD GPUs (HD 2000 / 3000 / 4000 series and later).

Choice of operating system and graphics card vendor:


For most visual stimulation applications, choice of GPU vendor and operating system won't be crucial. The different systems do however have some specific strength and weaknesses that may be important for some selected applications. This section summarizes a few of these considerations for different applications:

Relative strengths and weaknesses of Apple hardware + OS/X:

Relative strength and weakness of standard PC hardware under GNU/Linux and MS-Windows:

In terms of graphics capabilities and support, Linux and Windows are usually on par with each other, due to the fact that the Windows and Linux graphics drivers are usually written by the same companies and therefore often share large amounts of internal code across these operating systems. Choice of graphics hardware is the same for Linux and Windows as well, as these operating systems run on the same set of PC hardware (including Apple Macintosh hardware). Therefore actual support for graphics features and graphics performance is no discriminating factor when choosing between Windows or Linux on PC hardware. There are other non-graphics related reasons to choose one OS over the other though.

Both systems provide generally feature rich, high performance, mostly reliable graphics drivers and GPUs. Both systems are strong in dual display support and for dual display stereo stimulation (compared to OS/X shortcomings) and expensive for frame-sequential stereo stimulation (requiring high priced pro hardware, as opposed to OS/X out of the box support on cheap hardware). Boths systems provide more advanced, faster support for high precision framebuffers than OS/X. Both systems provide more options for special purpose hardware, e.g., genlocking / framelocking of many displays and support the latest GPU features ahead of OS/X. This comes at the price of less consistency across different PC hardware configurations and more work/trouble for users in setting up and maintaining their graphics drivers. Driver support for Laptop GPUs under Linux often requires tinkering, but is plenty and good, once one gets used to it. Driver support for Laptop GPUs under Windows varies from vendor to vendor but is quite often a complete disaster.

Technically, in our experience, Linux is much more advanced, feature rich, robust and reliable in its operation than MS-Windows. It provides much more robust and precise timing behaviour, higher overall performance and it is much more flexible and customizable for applications with special needs. Unfortunately, most of our userbase consists of Windows users and the Linux userbase is very small. Therefore we can't spend as many ressources on supporting and developing the Linux Psychtoolbox as we spend on maintaining the Windows Psychtoolbox for a larger userbase. This leads to the unfortunate situation that the Linux PTB lacks a few useful features wrt. the Windows Psychtoolbox, e.g., movie playback support, and that getting started with the Linux PTB likely involves a much steeper learning curve in the beginning. Therefore, we can not unconditionally recommend the current Linux Psychtoolbox over the Windows Psychtoolbox to beginners, but only to advanced power users, although this means that the majority of users will be locked to a technically far inferior operating system with many shortcomings.


Choice of ATI hardware vs. NVidia hardware:

...to be written...


You could stop reading here and be reasonably well informed, but if you are really curious, feel free to continue reading about the nitty gritty technical details ;-)


Graphics hardware requirements for specific PTB features:


OpenGL graphics hardware exposes its functionality via so called OpenGL extensions. Each extension defines a specific subset of functionality supported by the hardware. Specific advanced features of PTB-3 require your graphics hardware to support specific sets of OpenGL extensions. If you try to use an advanced PTB feature, PTB will probe your hardware for support of the required extension. If the extension is unsupported, PTB will either refuse use of an advanced feature or it will enable internal fallback implementations that do what you want, but at a much lower performance or precision and much higher resource requirements than if your hardware would support the extension. A list of all existing OpenGL extensions, including their full in-depth technical specification, can be found at the official OpenGL extension registry.

Different models of a specific generation of graphics hardware usually share support for a common set of extensions, but they differ in the precision, performance or efficiency with which features are supported as well as in the set of constraints that need to be fullfilled in order for the hardware efficiently to support a feature. The following websites list the specific set of extensions that are supported for specific models of graphics hardware for specific driver versions or operating system releases. They also list many interesting properties and limitations of these graphics cards. You will notice that there are separate websites for Windows/Linux and OS/X and that if you compare the resource limits, capabilities and feature sets of the same models of graphics hardware between Win/Lin and OS/X you'll sometimes find significant differences. Given that the hardware is the same, these differences are imposed by the different design and implementation of the graphics drivers and OpenGL subsystems of Windows/Linux versus OS/X.

If you want to buy a graphics card which is an optimal tradeoff between required features for your project and cost, you'll have to match the listed requirements of PTB against the features in those databases. PTB's Screen command outputs a list of all OpenGL extensions supported by your hardware + operating system + driver at startup ("OpenGL extensions are: ...") unless you suppress it. The websites above also provide a tool called GLInfo which probes your hardware and outputs a full listing of all tested properties if you need reliable information about your hardware.

Standard Screen subfunctions and their requirements:

Psychtoolbox imaging pipeline:

The Psychtoolbox imaging pipeline is a built-in framework for fast image processing on the graphics hardware, currently in beta stage. It allows to perform common image processing operations on image stimuli (represented as Psychtoolbox textures), to customize and extend the behavior of specific Screen drawing commands and to provide a set of fully automatic post processing operations on your final visual stimuli which may be useful for some more advanced applications. The infrastructure is integrated into PTB, but the specific operations are implemented as shader plugins, written in the OpenGL shading language (GLSL) and executed on the graphics processor itself. The imaging pipeline requires recent hardware for basic operation and mid-level to high-end hardware for the more advanced features.

Basic imaging pipeline support:

Provides the following features:

Minimum requirement for 2D drawing is the support for the following OpenGL extensions: GL_EXT_framebuffer_object, GL_ARB_multitexture, GL_ARB_shading_language_100, GL_ARB_shader_objects, GL_ARB_vertex_shader, GL_ARB_fragment_shader.
The following cards and later models are known to fully support these extensions: ATI Radeon 9600, NVidia GeforceFX-5200, Intel GMA-950 onboard chip of Intel based MacMinis and MacBooks under OS/X.

For 3D graphics via MOGL or OpenGL one needs these additional extensions: GL_ARB_depth_texture for depth buffer support and GL_EXT_packed_depth_stencil for stencil buffer support on some systems. Stencil buffers are unsupported on all PowerPC hardware (an OS limitation not a hardware limitation), unless you use OS-X 10.5 "Leopard" and later.

High dynamic range support:

This allows for drawing, processing and representation of images with floating point precision. Color values can exceed the normal 0-255 integer range of standard 8bpc framebuffers and one can handle images and colors with negative color components. This is useful for efficient creation of specific stimuli, e.g., fields of overlapping gabor patches and special blending operations. The final stimulus image can get automatically converted into a format suitable for special high precision display hardware, e.g., CRS Bits++, video attenuators, high dynamic range display devices.

Required extensions: A subset of GL_ARB_float_pixels, GL_APPLE_float_pixels, GL_ATI_float_pixels, GL_NV_float_pixels, GL_ATI_texture_float, GL_ARB_texture_float, GL_NV_texture_float.

At least the following graphics cards should support this according to their specification: NVidia Geforce-6000 series and ATI Radeon X800 series.
The following cards have been successfully tested for support: ATI X1600 and NVidia Geforce 7800. All later cards will support this as well.
The NVidia GeforceFX 5200 should support it, but malfunctioned on OS/X PowerPC during tests. This may be different on OS-X 10.5 Leopard, but is untested so far.
The Intel chips do not support these functions.

Advanced support for imaging pipeline:

This allows for more complex shaders and therefore for additional functionality, especially in the area of general purpose image processing:

The graphics hardware needs to be Shader model 3.0 (aka DirectX 9.0c, aka Windows Vista Premium ready) compliant.

Known cards that should work well: (Follow the links for detailed infos about the different models)

Good luck in choosing a suitable card.
Valid XHTML :: Valid CSS: :: Powered by WikkaWiki